Bisch v. County of Yolo, et al.
| MICHAEL BISCH |
| COUNTY OF YOLO, CITY OF DAVIS, CITY OF WOODLAND, CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, ANGEL BARAJAS, OSCAR VILLEGAS, DONALD SAYLOR, CHAD RINDE, AARON LAUREL, KEN HIATT, MICHAEL WEBB and YOLO FOOD BANK |
| 26-5490 |
| August 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A district courts order is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also Hyan v. Hummer, 825 F.3d 1043, 1046-47 (9th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (holding that the district courts order granting an anti-SLAPP motion against fewer than all defendants was not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine because an erroneous grant of an anti-SLAPP motion can be fully remedied on appeal). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 08/26/2026 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 9/2/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 10/2/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/12/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/31/2026. For appeal no. 26-5490, 2:23-cv-00455-DC-SCR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/25/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00455-DC-SCR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5490 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/25/2026 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
