Lane v. City of Tucson, et al.
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LANE
Defendant: CITY OF TUCSON, CHRIS MAGNUS, KEVIN HALL and CHAD KASMAR
Case Number: 26-553
Filed: January 27, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2026 Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant Justin Lane is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/15/2026 11:51 AM]
July 13, 2026 Filing 14 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Justin Lane.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 7/15/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 07/13/2026 11:40 AM] [Edited: 07/15/2026 11:51 AM]
June 23, 2026 Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellees is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/23/2026 10:36 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 12 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee City of Tucson, Appellee Chris Magnus, Appellee Kevin Hall, Appellee Chad Kasmar. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:13 PM]
May 19, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/22/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/19/2026 04:05 PM]
May 19, 2026 Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee City of Tucson, Appellee Chris Magnus, Appellee Kevin Hall, Appellee Chad Kasmar. [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:11 AM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 7, DE 8 by Appellant Justin Lane are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/22/2026 10:09 AM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 8 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Justin Lane.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 4/22/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 04/17/2026 01:58 PM] [Edited: 04/22/2026 10:07 AM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Justin Lane.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 4/22/2026, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 04/17/2026 01:51 PM] [Edited: 04/22/2026 10:06 AM]
March 3, 2026 Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. [Entered: 03/03/2026 12:36 PM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference Call 3/3/2026, 11:00 AM Pacific Time (originally 2/24/2026). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 02/05/2026 09:56 AM]
February 3, 2026 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/24/2026, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 02/03/2026 05:10 PM]
February 2, 2026 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Justin Lane. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:25 PM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/2/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/20/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 3/11/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/20/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 2/9/2026. For appeal no. 26-553, 4:22-cv-00394-BGM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:39 PM]
January 27, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:22-cv-00394-BGM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-553 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lane v. City of Tucson, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LANE
Represented By: Mr. Timothy P. Stackhouse
Represented By: Mr. Gerald Maltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF TUCSON
Represented By: Michelle Rebecca Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRIS MAGNUS
Represented By: Michelle Rebecca Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEVIN HALL
Represented By: Michelle Rebecca Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHAD KASMAR
Represented By: Michelle Rebecca Saavedra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?