Rohr v. County of Hawaii Board of Appeals
| CLAUDIA J. ROHR |
| COUNTY OF HAWAII BOARD OF APPEALS |
| 26-5661 |
| September 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Claudia J. Rohr. [Entered: 10/27/2026 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Demetri G. Lametti [Entered: 10/20/2026 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Demetri G. Lametti for Appellee County of Hawaii Board of Appeals. [Entered: 10/20/2026 04:54 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. On September 29, 2026, the district court resolved the August 26, 2026 post judgment motion. The stay of proceedings is therefore lifted and this appeal will proceed. The opening brief is due November 2, 2026. The answering brief is due December 2, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 10/07/2026 01:38 PM]
|
| Filing 7 District Court Order/Notice Received. EO: The court previously issued an indicative ruling on Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the judgment, as it lacked jurisdiction to resolve the motion due to Plaintiff's pending appeal. Dkt. No. [66]. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a)(2), the Ninth Circuit remanded the matter for the district court to resolve the Rule 60(b) motion. Dkt. No. [68]. For the reasons discussed in the earlier indicative ruling, the court DENIES Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. [No PDF attached] [Entered: 09/29/2026 02:30 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The district court entered judgment on July 27, 2026. Appellant filed a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 60(b), and a notice of appeal on August 26, 2026. Because the Rule 60(b) motion was not filed within 28 days after entry of the judgment and this appeal is pending, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (tolling motion must be filed within 28 days after entry of judgment), the district court issued an indicative ruling on August 27, 2026. The indicative ruling states that, were the matter remanded for the district court to resolve the Rule 60(b) motion, the district court would deny it. This case is remanded so the district court can rule on the August 26, 2026 motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 12.1(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(a)(2) (If a timely motion is made for relief that the court lacks authority to grant because of an appeal that has been docketed and is pending, the court may (1) defer considering the motion; (2) deny the motion; or (3) state either that it would grant the motion if the court of appeals remands for that purpose or that the motion raises a substantial issue.); see also Mendia v Garcia, 874 F. 3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2017) (filing of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 motion not required for a limited remand under Fed. R. App. P. 12.1(b) where district court already indicated it would entertain motion for the requested relief). Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 09/23/2026 11:03 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Claudia J. Rohr. [Court entered filing to correct DE 4] [Entered: 09/09/2026 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 4 DEFECTIVE --- MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Claudia J. Rohr. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 5] [Entered: 09/09/2026 04:45 AM] [Edited: 09/09/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Claudia J. Rohr. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 09/09/2026 04:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/10/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/13/2026. For appeal no. 26-5661, 1:25-cv-00017-MWJS-WRP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/01/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:25-cv-00017-MWJS-WRP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5661 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/01/2026 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rohr v. County of Hawaii Board of Appeals | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CLAUDIA J. ROHR | |
| Represented By: | Claudia J. Rohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COUNTY OF HAWAII BOARD OF APPEALS | |
| Represented By: | Demetri G. Lametti |
| Represented By: | Ms. Lerisa L. Heroldt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
