Aruci v. Wilson, et al.
| AJET ARUCI |
| WANDA WILSON, DAVID J. VENTURELLA, MOISES BECERRA and MARKWAYNE MULLIN |
| 26-5704 |
| September 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Alien Detainees) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to Opposition to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 12) filed by Appellee Wanda Wilson, Appellee David J. Venturella, Appellee Moises Becerra, Appellee Markwayne Mullin. [Entered: 09/08/2026 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 5) filed by Appellee Wanda Wilson, Appellee David J. Venturella, Appellee Moises Becerra, Appellee Markwayne Mullin. [Entered: 09/08/2026 05:06 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Andrew D. HURWITZ, Jennifer SUNG The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for a temporary administrative stay of removal pending a ruling on the emergency motion (Docket Entry Nos. 5, 6) for a stay of removal is granted. The existing briefing schedules remain in effect. [Entered: 09/03/2026 02:49 PM]
|
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Eric Grant [Entered: 09/03/2026 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric Grant for Appellee David J. Venturella, Appellee Markwayne Mullin, Appellee Moises Becerra, Appellee Wanda Wilson. [Entered: 09/03/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION for an Immediate Temporary Administrative Stay of Removal Pending the Court's Ruling on the Motion to Stay filed by Appellant Ajet Aruci. [Court edit to docket text to reflect request by party from the PDF of the motion] [Entered: 09/03/2026 10:22 AM] [Edited: 09/03/2026 02:06 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. The court has received the emergency motion for stay of removal. The response is due September 8, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time. The optional reply is due September 10, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time. [Entered: 09/02/2026 04:35 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Ajet Aruci. [Court entered filing, PDFs from DE 5] [Entered: 09/02/2026 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Appellant Ajet Aruci. [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Bashir Ghazialam [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bashir Ghazialam for Appellant Ajet Aruci. [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/12/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/13/2026. For appeal no. 26-5704, 1:26-cv-05132-JLT-EGC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:26-cv-05132-JLT-EGC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5704 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/02/2026 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
