Ramirez, et al. v. NGBI, Inc., et al.
| ROSA RAMIREZ, an Individual and ATANACIO ZELAYANDIA, an Individual |
| NGBI, INC., REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., ZBS LAW, LLP and DOES, All Persons Known, Unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, encumbrance, or interest adverse to Plaintiff's right, title and interest in and to the Real Property located 510 Hargrave Street, Inglewood, CA 90302 and Do |
| 26-585 |
| January 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MAIL RETURNED. DE 13 addressed to Appellant Atanacio Zelayandia. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 07/13/2026 01:53 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) to withdraw the motion to dismiss is granted. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to dismiss is deemed withdrawn. The pro se opening brief is due August 6, 2026. The answering brief is due September 7, 2026. The optional pro se reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellants are not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellants do not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 06/30/2026 08:11 AM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw Party Filing filed by Appellee Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. [Entered: 06/11/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 8) filed by Appellant Rosa Ramirez. [Entered: 06/01/2026 01:59 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) denied as unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Circuit Rule 27-11. [Entered: 05/28/2026 07:46 AM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. [Entered: 05/27/2026 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 9 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Rosa Ramirez. [Entered: 05/28/2026 07:44 AM] |
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 6 addressed to Appellants Rosa Ramirez, Atanacio Zelayandia. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:37 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. BENNETT and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The opening brief is due June 5, 2026. The answering brief is due July 6, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellants are not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellants do not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 04/28/2026 07:58 AM]
|
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Robert Betuel Norum, representing Appellee ZBS Law, LLP. Attorney not admitted to practice in this court. Party has other counsel. [Entered: 04/10/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Rosa Ramirez. [Entered: 03/26/2026 08:53 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 3/23/2026 [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:39 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/8/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/9/2026. For appeal no. 26-585, 2:22-cv-05695-MWF-JPR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-05695-MWF-JPR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-585 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramirez, et al. v. NGBI, Inc., et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROSA RAMIREZ, an Individual | |
| Represented By: | Rosa Ramirez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ATANACIO ZELAYANDIA, an Individual | |
| Represented By: | Atanacio Zelayandia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NGBI, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Seungdo Nathan Yun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Nathaniel Lucey |
| Represented By: | Quyen Thai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ZBS LAW, LLP | |
| Represented By: | Robert Betuel Norum |
| Represented By: | Mr. Bradford E. Klein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOES, All Persons Known, Unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, encumbrance, or interest adverse to Plaintiff's right, title and interest in and to the Real Property located 510 Hargrave Street, Inglewood, CA 90302 and Do | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
