Ratner-Stauber v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Plaintiff: ADOM RATNER-STAUBER
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Case Number: 26-5888
Filed: September 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2026 Filing 4 Attorney Sara Ugaz as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto, Kathleen Alice Kenealy, Molly Stephens. [Entered: 09/11/2026 01:38 PM]
September 11, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sara Ugaz for Appellee City of Los Angeles, Appellee Los Angeles Police Department replacing Hydee Feldstein Soto, Kathleen Alice Kenealy, Molly Stephens. [Entered: 09/11/2026 01:18 PM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/30/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 9/21/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/29/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/15/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 10/20/2026. For appeal no. 26-5888, 2:24-cv-07043-CV-SSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/10/2026 10:36 AM]
September 10, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-07043-CV-SSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5888 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/10/2026 10:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ratner-Stauber v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADOM RATNER-STAUBER
Represented By: Robert Joseph Muise
Represented By: David Yerushalmi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Represented By: Molly Stephens
Represented By: Ms. Kathleen Alice Kenealy
Represented By: Hydee Feldstein Soto
Represented By: Sara Ugaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Molly Stephens
Represented By: Ms. Kathleen Alice Kenealy
Represented By: Hydee Feldstein Soto
Represented By: Sara Ugaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?