Pennington Plaintiffs, et al. v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al.
| PENNINGTON PLAINTIFFS and SAN FRANCISCO SHIPYARD RESIDENTS |
| TETRA TECH EC, INC., TETRA TECH, INC., LENNAR CORPORATION, HPS1 BLOCK 50, LLC, BILL DOUGHERTY, FIVEPOINT HOLDINGS, LLC, ANDREW BOLT, NICK ZAFERES, EMILE HADDAD, HPS1 BLOCK 51, LLC, HPS1 BLOCK 53, LLC, HPS1 BLOCK 54, LLC, HPS DEVELOPMENT CO., LP and ONE TREASURE ISLAND |
| 26-5960 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Torts to Land |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/23/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/26/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/21/2026. For appeal no. 26-5960, 3:18-cv-05330-JD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/14/2026 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 Large Party Case Management Order For court efficiency and administration, the court has decided to process this case as a Large Party Case. All plaintiffs-appellants have been listed under one group name on the docket. All parties have been identified in Exhibit A to this order. The plaintiffs-appellants will proceed under the grouping name of Pennington Plaintiffs as listed in the above caption, in this case. Moving forward, the phrase Pennington Plaintiffs in any court notice,order, or opinion in this case will refer to all plaintiffs-appellants listed in Exhibit A. The case will proceed under the name: Pennington Plaintiffs, et al. v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc., et al. [Entered: 09/14/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:18-cv-05330-JD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-5960 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/14/2026 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
