Polskie Linie Lotnicze LOT SA v. The Boeing Company
Plaintiff: POLSKIE LINIE LOTNICZE LOT SA
Defendant: THE BOEING COMPANY
Case Number: 26-6115
Filed: September 21, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2026 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Diana Gurfel Shapiro [COURT UPDATE: Counsel was not added during case opening.] [Entered: 09/21/2026 05:00 PM]
September 21, 2026 Filing 3 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Evan Kwarta, representing Appellant Polskie Linie Lotnicze LOT SA.[COURT UPDATE: Counsel added in error.] [Entered: 09/21/2026 04:55 PM]
September 21, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellant) 10/5/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/28/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/8/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 9/29/2026, Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellee) 10/5/2026, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 10/29/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/7/2027. For appeal no. 26-6115, 2:21-cv-01449-RSM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/21/2026 09:24 AM]
September 21, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-01449-RSM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-6115 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/21/2026 09:10 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Polskie Linie Lotnicze LOT SA v. The Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: POLSKIE LINIE LOTNICZE LOT SA
Represented By: Evan Kwarta
Represented By: Yonatan Spielberg
Represented By: Mary Dow
Represented By: Anthony Battista
Represented By: Diana Gurfel Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE BOEING COMPANY
Represented By: Ulrike B. Connelly
Represented By: Mr. Michael Sylvain Paisner
Represented By: Marten N. King
Represented By: Mr. Harry H. Schneider, Jr
Represented By: Mr. Matthew Robert Koerner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?