Valve Corporation v. Fish, et al.
| VALVE CORPORATION |
| GREGORY FISH, ALEC BIRENBAUM, NON-APPEALING RESPONDENTS IN VALVE V. FISH, ETHAN LEFEBVRE, CHRISTIAN GRABER, JEREMY LUCAS and LANCE VICENTE |
| 26-6269 |
| September 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Arbitration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Shaud Gerard Tavakoli [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Meredith Slawe [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shaud Gerard Tavakoli for Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Meredith Slawe for Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Wayne McTigue for Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Shay Dvoretzky [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Parker Andrew Rider-Longmaid for Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shay Dvoretzky for Appellee Valve Corporation. [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/30/2026, Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellant and Appellee) 10/9/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 11/4/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 12/4/2026. For appeal no. 26-6269, 2:24-cv-01717-JNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/25/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Large Party Case Management Order For court efficiency and administration, the court has decided to process this case as a Large Party Case. Instead of listing each respondent who did not file a notice of appeal and has no appellate court role on the docket, the respondents in the list attached to this order will proceed under the grouping name of: Non-Appealing Respondents in Valve v. Fish. Moving forward, the phrase Non-Appealing Respondents in Valve v. Fish in any court notice, order, or opinion in this case will refer to all respondents in the attached list. The case will proceed under the name: Valve Corporation v. Fish. [SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT] [Entered: 09/25/2026 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01717-JNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-6269 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/25/2026 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
