Zhu, et al. v. Wang, et al.
| ZHIJIE ZHU and YATING WANG |
| SHU-MEI WANG, BEIJING MEN, JAMES THORPE, KIMBERLY THORPE, SETH HECK, UNKNOWN HECK, named as Jane Doe Heck, NORTHLAKE CAPITAL & DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Washington limited liability compny, 183RD SHORELINE APARTMENTS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, 5326 ROOSEVELT WAY, LLC, 4206 7TH AVE, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, DANIEL J. BUGBEE, ATTORNEY, DOMINIQUE RENEE SCALIA, attorney of DBS Law, DAN FALLON, GRANT FALLON, ALIVIA SANDQUIST, ALLISON O'DEA, D2 COMMERCIAL LENDING, LLC, DBS LAW, SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, WEST COAST APARTMENT ADVISORS, LLC, LAKEHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, FAUNTLEROY THREE, LLC, WEST SEATTLE THREE, LLC, 2608 EVERETT, LLC, 2608 HOYT, LLC, 616 ANDERSON, LLC, 616 TACOMA, LLC, WEDGEWOOD INVESTMENTS, LLC, 7354 34TH AVE, LLC, DON & DAR RAFTIS FAMILY, LLC, HUNTER RENTAL INVESTMENTS, LLC and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Doe LLCs |
| 26-659 |
| February 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. (John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY) A district courts dismissal order is not final or immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the January 26, 2026 and January 29, 2026 orders did not dispose of all claims as to all parties. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/19/2026 10:46 AM]
|
| Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Appellee William J. Enoch [Entered: 03/10/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William J. Enoch for Appellee 2608 Hoyt, LLC. [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 9 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Claire Rootjes, representing Appellee D2 Commercial Lending, LLC, Appellee DBS Law. Attorney not admitted to practice in this court. Parties have other counsel. [Entered: 02/18/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Dominique Scalia [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dominique Scalia for Appellee D2 Commercial Lending, LLC, Appellee Dan Fallon, Appellee Daniel J. Bugbee, Appellee DBS Law, Appellee Dominique Renee Scalia, Appellee Grant Fallon. [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Daniel J. Bugbee [Entered: 02/12/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel J. Bugbee for Appellee D2 Commercial Lending, LLC, Appellee Dan Fallon, Appellee Daniel J. Bugbee, Appellee DBS Law, Appellee Dominique Renee Scalia, Appellee Grant Fallon. [Entered: 02/11/2026 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 02/09/2026 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Catherine Cecily Clark as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Karleen Joy Scharer. [COURT UPDATE: counsel Scharer was terminated in the district court; adding counsel Clark to docket] [Entered: 02/06/2026 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/14/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/16/2026. For appeal no. 26-659, 2:23-cv-01395-JCC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/03/2026 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01395-JCC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-659 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/03/2026 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
