Sivanadlyan, et al. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
| ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI, PARVATHI SIVANADLYAN and Swamji Sri Selvam Siddhar |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 26-6848 |
| October 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 10/15/2026 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/15/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-6848 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 10/15/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Annamalai Annamalai, Petitioner Parvathi Sivanadlyan. [Entered: 10/15/2026 04:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
