United States of America v. Spurlock
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CORY SPURLOCK
Case Number: 26-689
Filed: February 4, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2026 Filing 7 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Christopher P. Frey, Counsel for Appellant Kate Berry, representing Appellant Cory Spurlock. [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:45 AM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Christopher P. Frey. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:42 AM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Kate Berry. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:39 AM]
February 5, 2026 Filing 4 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant Cory Spurlock [Entered: 02/05/2026 11:09 AM]
February 4, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam McMeen Flake for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:18 PM]
February 4, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: Life. Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 3/20/2026, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/29/2026, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 2/18/2026, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/29/2026. For appeal no. 26-689, 3:23-cr-00022-MMD-CLB-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:17 PM]
February 4, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cr-00022-MMD-CLB-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-689 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Spurlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Mr. Adam McMeen Flake
Represented By: Mina Chang
Represented By: Andrew Keenan
Represented By: Sigal Chattah
Represented By: Miss Penelope J. Brady
Represented By: Megan Rachow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORY SPURLOCK
Represented By: Kate Berry
Represented By: Christopher P. Frey
Represented By: Jeremy Baron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?