Cerkezoglu v. Babbel GmbH
Petitioner: BABBEL GMBH
Respondent: DEBORAH CERKEZOGLU
Case Number: 26-6944
Filed: October 20, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. William A. FLETCHER, Ana DE ALBA The court has received the emergency motion to stay. The district courts October 8, 2026 remand order is administratively stayed pending further order to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the motion to stay. See Doe #1 v. Trump, 944 F.3d 1222, 1223 (9th Cir. 2019). The response to the emergency motion and answer to the petition are due October 26, 2026. The optional reply in support of the emergency motion and optional reply in support of the petition are due October 28, 2026. [Entered: 10/21/2026 03:36 PM]
October 20, 2026 Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:23 AM]
October 20, 2026 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/19/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-6944 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:21 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Petitioner Babbel GmbH. [Court entered filing to correct DE 3] [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:48 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 6 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Babbel GmbH. [Court entered filing to correct DE 3] [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:39 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 3 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to File Document Under Seal filed by Petitioner Babbel GmbH. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DEs 6 & 7] [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:20 AM] [Edited: 10/20/2026 10:49 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(c) filed by Petitioner Babbel GmbH. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:20 AM]
October 19, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(c) filed by Petitioner Babbel GmbH. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cerkezoglu v. Babbel GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DEBORAH CERKEZOGLU
Represented By: Lynn Toops
Represented By: Raina C. Borrelli
Represented By: Samuel J. Strauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BABBEL GMBH
Represented By: Mrs. Tjitske Dekker
Represented By: T. Ray Ivey
Represented By: Mr. Damon Elder
Represented By: Pranav Mulpur
Represented By: Stephanie Schuster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?