Curry v. Rolland, et al.
Plaintiff: RYAN INDIANA CURRY
Defendant: BROWN, Correctional Officer (Capt), TODD MURRAY, DUTY, Correction Officer (Sgt), KELLY, Correction Officer (Sgt) and T. ROLLAND
Case Number: 26-7086
Filed: October 23, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief has been filed. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 10/30/2026 03:43 PM]
October 30, 2026 Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Ryan Indiana Curry is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/30/2026 02:14 PM]
October 30, 2026 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Indiana Curry. [Entered: 10/30/2026 02:13 PM]
October 27, 2026 Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Ryan Indiana Curry is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/27/2026 01:13 PM]
October 26, 2026 Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ryan Indiana Curry.--[COURT UPDATE: Backdated entry to date of receipt] [Entered: 10/27/2026 01:12 PM] [Edited: 10/27/2026 01:19 PM]
October 23, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/1/2027, Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellee) 11/6/2026, Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellant) 11/6/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/2/2026. For appeal no. 26-7086, 2:23-cv-00791-TLN-EFB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/23/2026 02:18 PM]
October 23, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00791-TLN-EFB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-7086 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/23/2026 02:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Curry v. Rolland, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BROWN, Correctional Officer (Capt)
Represented By: Ravpreet Bhangoo
Represented By: Mr. Chase Samuel Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TODD MURRAY
Represented By: Ravpreet Bhangoo
Represented By: Mr. Chase Samuel Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUTY, Correction Officer (Sgt)
Represented By: Ravpreet Bhangoo
Represented By: Mr. Chase Samuel Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KELLY, Correction Officer (Sgt)
Represented By: Ravpreet Bhangoo
Represented By: Mr. Chase Samuel Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. ROLLAND
Represented By: Ravpreet Bhangoo
Represented By: Mr. Chase Samuel Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RYAN INDIANA CURRY
Represented By: Ryan Indiana Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?