Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, et al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, et al.

Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, et al.

Plaintiff:	MAYANK PRASAD
Defendant:	COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, MANNING & KASS ELLROD RAMIREZ TRESTER, LLP, a California limited liability partnership, KRISTIN M. WROBEL, Esq., individually, DAVID GALLARDO, Deputy Probation Officer, individually and in his official capacity, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Direct Supervisory Authority for PO Grace Johnson, individually and in their official capacity, named as John and Jane Does 1-10 inclusive in the original complaint, MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, individually and in his official capacity and MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, (MCAPD)
Case Number:	26-7428
Filed:	November 6, 2026
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner-Civil Rights

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2026	Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellant) 11/20/2026 Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2026 . For appeal no. 26-7428, 2:26-cv-05947-KML--DMF. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/06/2026 11:09 AM]
November 6, 2026	Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-05947-KML--DMF has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-7428 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/06/2026 11:07 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2026

Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Corporate Disclosure Statement due (Appellant) 11/20/2026 Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2026 . For appeal no. 26-7428, 2:26-cv-05947-KML--DMF. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/06/2026 11:09 AM]

November 6, 2026

Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-05947-KML--DMF has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-7428 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/06/2026 11:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Prasad v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MANNING & KASS ELLROD RAMIREZ TRESTER, LLP, a California limited liability partnership
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: KRISTIN M. WROBEL, Esq., individually
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID GALLARDO, Deputy Probation Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, Direct Supervisory Authority for PO Grace Johnson, individually and in their official capacity, named as John and Jane Does 1-10 inclusive in the original complaint
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT, (MCAPD)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAYANK PRASAD
Represented By:	Mayank Prasad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?