Beagle Labs, Inc., et al. v. AppFolio, Inc.
Plaintiff: BEAGLE LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BEAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, BIG BEAGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, RENTAL PROPERTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company and YRIG RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., an Alabama corporation
Defendant: APPFOLIO, INC., a California corporation
Case Number: 26-769
Filed: February 6, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2026 Filing 26 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 25 by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc. is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/29/2026 09:51 AM]
June 26, 2026 Filing 25 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 06/26/2026 08:25 PM]
June 24, 2026 Filing 24 ADDED Counsel for Appellant David Spencer Bloch [Entered: 06/24/2026 03:11 PM]
June 24, 2026 Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Spencer Bloch for Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 06/24/2026 02:55 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 22 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for October 2026 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [26-769] [Entered: 06/17/2026 11:25 AM]
June 5, 2026 Filing 21 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellee AppFolio, Inc. is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 06/05/2026 04:53 PM]
June 5, 2026 Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee AppFolio, Inc.. [Entered: 06/05/2026 01:10 PM]
April 30, 2026 Filing 19 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due June 5, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/30/2026 11:51 AM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 18 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee AppFolio, Inc.. [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:24 AM]
April 20, 2026 Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee AppFolio, Inc.. [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:05 AM]
April 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 15) denied. Streamlined extensions of time are not available for any brief filed in a Preliminary Injunction Appeal. The filer must file a motion. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(3). [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:19 PM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 15 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee AppFolio, Inc.. [Entered: 04/17/2026 11:14 AM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Jeremiah Levine [Entered: 04/16/2026 05:13 PM]
April 16, 2026 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeremiah Levine for Appellee AppFolio, Inc.. [Entered: 04/16/2026 04:54 PM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 12 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief and Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 10, DE 11 by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc. are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:24 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:11 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 04/07/2026 12:00 AM]
April 1, 2026 Filing 9 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 04/01/2026 08:39 AM]
March 3, 2026 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 6, 2026. The answering brief is due May 6, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 03/03/2026 03:51 PM]
February 27, 2026 Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 02/27/2026 01:21 PM]
February 20, 2026 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. [Entered: 02/20/2026 03:23 PM]
February 12, 2026 Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 02/12/2026 10:53 AM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Beagle Labs, Inc., Appellant Beagle Technologies, Inc., Appellant Big Beagle, Inc., Appellant Rental Property Managers Association, LLC, Appellant YRIG Risk Retention Group, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/11/2026 08:46 PM]
February 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal. See Religious Tech. Ctr., Church of Scientology Intl, Inc. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1308 (9th Cir. 1989) (Ordinarily, an appeal does not lie from the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order . . . .). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 02/10/2026 01:47 PM]
February 6, 2026 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 3/6/2026, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/11/2026, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 4/3/2026. For appeal no. 26-769, 2:25-cv-12248-JFW-SSC.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/06/2026 04:54 PM]
February 6, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-12248-JFW-SSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-769 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/06/2026 04:52 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Beagle Labs, Inc., et al. v. AppFolio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEAGLE LABS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Michael Burshteyn
Represented By: Mr. David Spencer Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEAGLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Michael Burshteyn
Represented By: Mr. David Spencer Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BIG BEAGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Michael Burshteyn
Represented By: Mr. David Spencer Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RENTAL PROPERTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company
Represented By: Michael Burshteyn
Represented By: Mr. David Spencer Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YRIG RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., an Alabama corporation
Represented By: Michael Burshteyn
Represented By: Mr. David Spencer Bloch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APPFOLIO, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Martin Pritikin
Represented By: Mr. Jeremiah Levine, ASUSAT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?