Stanley v. Holland, et al.
Plaintiff: RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR.
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Sergeant HOLLAND, HARRINGTON, Deputy Sheriff, VAN KLEEK, Deputy Sheriff, Deputy Sheriff Sergeant WHITE and GRIFFEN, Deputy Sheriff
Case Number: 26-777
Filed: February 9, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2026 Filing 8 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr.. [Entered: 04/09/2026 04:41 PM]
April 1, 2026 Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr. Action taken: resending to Martinez Detention Facility, 901 Court Street, Martinez, CA 94553; along with DE 3. [Entered: 04/01/2026 03:21 PM]
March 12, 2026 Filing 6 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr.. [Entered: 03/12/2026 04:12 PM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 5 RESPONSE to Order - Order to Show Cause (OSC) (DE 3) filed by Appellee Holland, Appellee Harrington, Appellee Griffen. [Entered: 03/09/2026 03:12 PM]
February 24, 2026 Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr.. [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:24 PM]
February 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellants notice of appeal was dated January 3, 2026, and the district court received it on February 5, 2026, more than 30 days after the district court entered judgment on December 11, 2025. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). A pro se prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed when deposited in the institutions internal mail system if appellant submits sufficient evidence. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days, appellant must file a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date the notice of appeal was deposited and whether first-class postage was prepaid. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a declaration or statement, appellees may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. The clerk will serve Form 33 Inmate Declaration of Timely Filing on appellant. [Entered: 02/10/2026 10:18 AM]
February 9, 2026 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/20/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/23/2026. For appeal no. 26-777, 3:24-cv-06493-JD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/09/2026 11:39 AM]
February 9, 2026 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-06493-JD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-777 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/09/2026 11:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stanley v. Holland, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR.
Represented By: Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Sergeant HOLLAND
Represented By: Mr. Patrick L. Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARRINGTON, Deputy Sheriff
Represented By: Mr. Patrick L. Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VAN KLEEK, Deputy Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Sergeant WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GRIFFEN, Deputy Sheriff
Represented By: Mr. Patrick L. Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?