Hearns v. Trahune, et al.
| CLARENCE L. HEARNS |
| CAL TRAHUNE and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California |
| 26-818 |
| February 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the request filed on 03/19/2026. [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Clarence L. Hearns. [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:09 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Bridget S. BADE This appeal is from the denial of appellants Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. 3) is denied because appellant has not shown that (1) jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b) motion and, (2) jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the underlying [28 U.S.C. 2254 petition] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. United States v. Winkles, 795 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Martinez v. Shinn, 33 F.4th 1254, 1261 (9th Cir. 2022). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 03/16/2026 01:22 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Clarence L. Hearns. [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 1/20/26. [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:00-cv-02044-SPG-AGR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-818 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/10/2026 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
