WhatsApp, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
| WHATSAPP and META PLATFORMS, INC. |
| NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED |
| 26-874 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 26, 2026. The answering brief is due June 25, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 04/10/2026 11:51 AM]
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion to Extend Time to File Brief (DE 17) filed by Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. [Entered: 04/03/2026 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee WhatsApp, Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. [Entered: 04/02/2026 08:16 PM] |
| Filing 16 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Alexander Hale Loomis [Entered: 04/01/2026 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Hale Loomis for Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. [Entered: 04/01/2026 09:12 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/26/2026, Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/23/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/16/2026 05:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 12 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 02/26/2026 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Antonio Perez-Marques for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., Appellee WhatsApp. [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Greg D. Andres for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., Appellee WhatsApp. [Entered: 02/25/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee WhatsApp, Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. [Entered: 02/25/2026 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Micah Block for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., Appellee WhatsApp. [Entered: 02/25/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 02/19/2026 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Derek Shaffer for Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. [Entered: 02/19/2026 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/23/2026. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 02/18/2026 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Joseph Nicholas Akrotirianakis, representing Appellant NSO Group Technologies Limited, Appellant Q Cyber Technologies Limited. [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Joseph Nicholas Akrotirianakis. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 02/16/2026 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 2/17/2026, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/23/2026, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/24/2026. For appeal no. 26-874, 4:19-cv-07123-PJH. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:19-cv-07123-PJH has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-874 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/12/2026 02:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
