Emrit, et al. v. Dogg, et al.
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of "Larry Birkhead Attorney" Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney, United Emrits of America, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Entertainment Attorney for Outkast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson, and Salahis and GO GO SATISH, Former Client of Thomas Hart, Esquire of On The Potomac of Washington, DC and Holland & Knight, LLP and Entertainment Attorney for Gloria Estefan and James Todd Smith also Known as LL Cool J |
| SNOOP DOGG, Marijuana Smoker named Calvin Broadus, SNOOP DOGG, Bowl in Arizona, The Racist STATE OF ARIZONA, The Only State Which Did not Approve of the Holiday for the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Junior, NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORP., VIVENDI SE, PEACOCK TV, LLC, UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE, MIKE TIRICO, CHRIS COLLINSWORTH, SUNDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL, ROGER GOODELL, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC, NFL, KENDRICK LAMAR, JAY-Z, DR. DRE, ICE CUBE, ESTATE OF EAZY E "ERIC WRIGHT", SUPER BOWL HALFTIME SHOW and BAD BUNNY |
| 26-884 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. (John B. OWENS, Eric D. MILLER, Patrick J. BUMATAY) This court has reviewed the February 9, 2026 notice of appeal and the district court record pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 15-80221. The appeal lacks sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 26-884 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of Washington, constitutes the mandate of this court. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [Entered: 03/20/2026 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 13 DOCUMENT NOT SENT. NAN for the 03/09/2026 request for information as Appellant wrote "no documnets requested" on the Form 29. [Entered: 03/10/2026 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/10/2026 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/10/2026 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/10/2026 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/10/2026 07:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous pro se filings received from Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit. [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 26-884. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 15-80221, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 02/12/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:26-cv-00007-MKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-884 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/12/2026 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
