Miranda Cutuc, et al. v. Blanche
| ERIKA LORENA MIRANDA CUTUC and J. D. M. C. |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-919 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 03/30/2026 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Erika Lorena Miranda Cutuc, Petitioner J. D. M. C.. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 10.] [Entered: 02/27/2026 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Erika Lorena Miranda Cutuc, Petitioner J. D. M. C.. [Wrong filing type used, PDF includes incorrect case number; refiled correctly at DE 11.] [Entered: 02/26/2026 07:47 PM] [Edited: 02/27/2026 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 FEE PAID by Roxana V Muro, Receipt #745, check number 30786550 for $605.00. [Entered: 02/23/2026 12:28 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioners must pay a $600 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioners do not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioners. [Entered: 02/20/2026 03:23 PM]
|
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Stephanie Leigh Groff [Entered: 02/18/2026 07:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephanie Leigh Groff for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/18/2026 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 3/30/2026, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 5/8/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 6/8/2026, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 4/20/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/13/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-919 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner J. D. M. C., Petitioner Erika Lorena Miranda Cutuc. [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
