Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta Teamworks, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: Rochelle Jaffe, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eve Jaffe
Defendant - Appellee: Pallotta Teamworks, A California Corporation, et al. and University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, On behalf of its R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Case Number: 03-7121
Filed: August 29, 2003
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
July 16, 2004 Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta Teamworks, et al

Search for this case: Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta Teamworks, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Rochelle Jaffe, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eve Jaffe
Represented By: Frederic Willard Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Pallotta Teamworks, A California Corporation, et al.
Represented By: William Joseph Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, On behalf of its R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Represented By: Neal Mullan Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?