McSally, Martha v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Martha McSally, Lt. Col.
Defendant / Appellee: Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
Case Number: 04-5303
Filed: August 31, 2004
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2019 CLERK'S FILE RETIRED [1786457] - The following NARA information may be used to locate the archived clerks file at the Federal Records Center - Accession Number: 276-2018-0010; Location Number: Shelved; Box Number: 21. [04-5303] [Entered: 05/07/2019 11:43 AM]
November 10, 2005 NOTICE filed by the Supreme Court that the petition for writ of certiorari was denied. [933894-1] [Entered: 11/25/2005 05:34 PM]
July 11, 2005 NOTICE filed by Supreme Court of the United States, informing the court that the petition for writ of certiorari was filed on July 1, 2005, and placed on the docket July 6, 2005 as No. 05-40 [908641-1]. [Entered: 07/27/2005 11:51 AM]
June 1, 2005 MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, District Court [897442-1] [Entered: 06/01/2005 11:12 AM]
April 13, 2005 RECORD On APPEAL returned . [Entered: 04/13/2005 11:52 AM]
April 8, 2005 PER CURIAM ORDER filed [888106] that the motion for summary affirmance filed by Donald H. Rumsfeld [857503-1] be granted and the District Court's judgment filed July 23, 2004, denying appellant's request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs, be affirmed. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate [888106-2] pending disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. . Before Judges Edwards, Henderson, Randolph . [Entry Date: 4/8/05] [PRINTED IN SLIP OPINION FORMAT] [Entered: 04/08/2005 11:21 AM]
December 3, 2004 REPLY filed [863680-1] (5 copies) by Appellee Donald H. Rumsfeld (certificate of service dated 12/1/04 ) to a response to the motion for summary affirmance [857503-1] . [Entered: 12/06/2004 05:07 PM]
December 1, 2004 RECORD ON APPEAL filed . [Entered: 12/01/2004 04:18 PM]
November 23, 2004 CLERK'S ORDER filed [861475] granting motion extend time filed by Donald H. Rumsfeld [861473-1] Reply now due on 12/3/04. [Entry Date: 11/23/04] [Entered: 11/23/2004 09:13 AM]
November 22, 2004 MOTION filed (5 copies) by Appellee Donald H. Rumsfeld (certificate of service dated 11/22/04 ) to extend time to file [861473-1] a reply to an opposition to the motion for summary affirmance [857503-1] until 12/3/04 . [Entered: 11/23/2004 09:11 AM]
November 16, 2004 RESPONSE filed [860304-1] (5 copies) by Appellant Martha McSally (certificate of service by maildated 11/16/04 ) to a motion for summary affirmance [857503-1] . [Entered: 11/17/2004 03:30 PM]
November 1, 2004 MOTION filed (5 copies) by Appellee Donald H. Rumsfeld (certificate of service dated 11/1/04 ) for summary affirmance [857503-1] Response due on 11/15/04 . [Entered: 11/02/2004 05:56 PM]
October 18, 2004 INITIAL SUBMISSIONS filed by Appellant Martha McSally [856994-1] : docketing statement; lower court decision; deferred appendix notice (Deferred Appendix needed = N) . [Entered: 11/01/2004 09:52 AM]
October 18, 2004 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Thomas Stephen Neuberger for Appellant Martha McSally, Randal M. Shaheen for Appellant Martha McSally [857007-1] . [Entered: 11/01/2004 10:09 AM]
October 18, 2004 NOTICE filed by Appellant Martha McSally FINAL transcript status notice filed [860366-1] . Transcripts completed . . Certificate of service date 10/14/04 . [Entered: 11/17/2004 04:32 PM]
September 16, 2004 CLERK'S ORDER filed [848471] directing Appellant to file [848471-1] : docketing statement due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; certificate of counsel due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; statement of issues due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; lower court decision due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; any procedural motions due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; transcript status notice due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; deferred appendix notice due 10/18/04 for Martha McSally ; entry of appearance form due 10/18/04 for Randal M. Shaheen ; any dispositive motions due 11/1/04 for Martha McSally. Directing Appellee to file [848471-2]: certificate of counsel due 10/18/04 for Donald H. Rumsfeld ; any motions due 10/18/04 for Donald H. Rumsfeld ; entry of appearance form due 10/18/04 for Ronald James Wiltsie ; any motions due 11/1/04 for Donald H. Rumsfeld. [Entry Date: 9/16/04] [Entered: 09/16/2004 04:00 PM]
August 31, 2004 CIVIL-US CASE docketed. Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant Martha McSally. [845623-1] [Entered: 08/31/2004 04:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: McSally, Martha v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Martha McSally, Lt. Col.
Represented By: Thomas Stephen Neuberger
Represented By: Randal M. Shaheen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
Represented By: Michael Jay Singer
Represented By: Ronald James Wiltsie II
Represented By: Peter Douglas Keisler Esquire
Represented By: Michael Eugene Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?