Murphy, Marrita, et al v. IRS, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: Marrita Murphy and Daniel J. Leveille
Defendant - Appellee: Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: No Fear Coalition, The National Employment Lawyers Association, National Employment Lawyers Association, Andrew Jackson Society, National Taxpayers Union, National Taxpayers Union and Liberty Coalition and the Innocence Project
Case Number: 05-5139
Filed: April 26, 2005
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 22, 2006 Murphy, Marrita, et al v. IRS, et al
July 3, 2007 Murphy, Marrita, et al v. IRS, et al

Search for this case: Murphy, Marrita, et al v. IRS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Marrita Murphy
Represented By: David Keith Colapinto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Daniel J. Leveille
Represented By: David Keith Colapinto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini Tamami
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini Tamami
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae for appellant: No Fear Coalition
Represented By: Colin Michael Dunham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae for appellant: The National Employment Lawyers Association, National Employment Lawyers Association
Represented By: Richard Randolph Renner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae for appellant: Andrew Jackson Society
Represented By: Richard Randolph Renner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae for appellant: National Taxpayers Union, National Taxpayers Union
Represented By: Richard Randolph Renner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae for appellant: Liberty Coalition and the Innocence Project
Represented By: Richard Randolph Renner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?