Keeley, Shawn v. Small, Lawrence M., et al
| Shawn Keeley |
| Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution and Smithsonian Institution |
| 05-5369 |
| September 30, 2005 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S FILE RETIRED [1963757] - The following NARA information may be used to locate the archived clerks file at the Federal Records Center - Accession Number: 276-22-0006; Location Number: Shelved; Box Number: 26. [05-5369] [Entered: 09/14/2022 10:55 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER filed [941597] Dismissing as moot motion hold case in abeyance pending settlement discussions. [941271-1]; The Clerk shall not the eocket that this case is dismissed [941594-1] No mandate shall issue. [941597-1] . [Entry Date: 1/10/06] [Entered: 01/10/2006 07:36 AM] |
| STIPULATION filed (5 copies) to dismiss case voluntarily [941594-1] . [Entered: 01/10/2006 07:35 AM] |
| MOTION filed (5 copies) by Appellee Lawrence M. Small, Appellee Smithsonian Inst (certificate of service dated 12/19/05 ) to hold case in abeyance pending settlement discussions [941271-1] . [Entered: 01/07/2006 11:34 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER filed [925669-1] granting the joint motion to hold case in abeyance [925666-1]. This case is hereby held in abeyance pending further order of the court. The parties are directed to file motions to govern future proceedings in this case by December 19, 2005 [925669-1]. [Entry Date: 10/19/05] [Entered: 10/19/2005 09:55 AM] |
| JOINT MOTION filed (5 copies) by Appellant Shawn Keeley and Appellees Lawrence M. Small, and Smithsonian Institution to hold appeal in abeyance pending mediation [925666-1]. [Entered: 10/19/2005 09:51 AM] |
| INITIAL SUBMISSIONS filed by Appellees Lawrence M. Small, and the Smithsonian Institution [925568-1]: certificate of counsel. [Entered: 10/19/2005 06:00 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorneys Oliver W. McDaniel, Michael Joseph Ryan, and Kenneth L. Wainstein for Federal Appellees Lawrence M. Small, and Smithsonian Institution [925567-1]. [Entered: 10/19/2005 05:57 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorneys Randal M. Shaheen, and Craig Littleton Parshall for Appellant Shawn Keeley [924506-1]. (Styled as "Statement of Representation") [Entered: 10/13/2005 02:59 PM] |
| INITIAL SUBMISSIONS filed by the Appellant Shawn Keeley [924508-1]: statement of issues. [Entered: 10/13/2005 03:04 PM] |
| NOTICE filed by the Appellant Shawn Keeley FINAL transcript status report filed [924509-1]. Appellant advises that no transcript will be ordered in this appeal. (certificate of mail service dated 10/6/05). [Entered: 10/13/2005 03:05 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER filed [923626] directing Appellant to file [923626-1] : docketing statement due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; certificate of counsel due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; statement of issues due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; lower court decision due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; any procedural motions due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; transcript status notice due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; deferred appendix notice due 11/7/05 for Shawn Keeley ; entry of appearance form due 11/7/05 for Craig Littleton Parshall ; any dispositive motions due 11/21/05 for Shawn Keeley. Directing Appellee to file [923626-2] : certificate of counsel due 11/7/05 for Lawrence M. Small ; any procedural motions due 11/7/05 for Lawrence M. Small ; entry of appearance form due 11/7/05 for R. Lawrence ; any dispositive motions due 11/21/05 for M. Small. [Entry Date: 10/6/05] [Entered: 10/06/2005 04:36 PM] |
| CIVIL-US CASE docketed. Notice of Appeal filed by Appellant Shawn Keeley. [922226-1] [Entered: 09/30/2005 12:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
