Nathan Lindell, et al v. Landis Corporation 401(K) Plan, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: Nathan Lindell
Defendant - Appellee: Landis Corporation 401(K) Plan and Hugh Jeffery Fox, PLAN ADMINISTRATOR of the LANDIS CORPORATION 401(k) PLAN
:
Case Number: 10-7104
Filed: August 26, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Search for this case: Nathan Lindell, et al v. Landis Corporation 401(K) Plan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Nathan Lindell
Represented By: Denise Marie Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Landis Corporation 401(K) Plan
Represented By: Joel P. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Hugh Jeffery Fox, PLAN ADMINISTRATOR of the LANDIS CORPORATION 401(k) PLAN
Represented By: Joel P. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Joel P. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.