Audrick Payne v. District of Columbia Governme, et al
| Audrick Payne |
| District of Columbia Government, Linda Argo, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Lisa Marie Morgan, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Nicholas A. Majett, Individually and as the Supervisor of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs and Patrick J. Canavan, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs |
| 11-7116 |
| October 7, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Payne v. District of Columbia Government, et al.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1207502484
OPINION filed [1440053] (Pages: 18) for the Court by Judge Sentelle, Opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment (Pages: 1) by Judge Rogers [11-7116]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Audrick Payne v. District of Columbia Governme, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Audrick Payne | |
| Represented By: | David A. Branch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: District of Columbia Government | |
| Represented By: | Donna M. Murasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Linda Argo, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Donna M. Murasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Lisa Marie Morgan, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Donna M. Murasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Nicholas A. Majett, Individually and as the Supervisor of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Donna M. Murasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Patrick J. Canavan, Individually and as the Former Director of the D.C. Consumer and Regulatory Affairs | |
| Represented By: | Donna M. Murasky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
