People for the Ethical Treatm v. National Institutes of Health
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals |
National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services |
12-5183 |
June 8, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. National Institutes of Health |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1207577469 OPINION filed [1483953] (Pages: 17) for the Court by Judge Srinivasan [12-5183] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: People for the Ethical Treatm v. National Institutes of Health | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals | |
Represented By: | Jessica Almy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.