Ian James v. International Painters And Al, et al

Defendant - Appellee: International Painters And Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan and Gary J. Meyers
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ian Phillip James
Case Number: 13-7002
Filed: January 7, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
December 20, 2013 Summary James v. Int'l Painters, et al.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2013 1207556371 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION filed [1471647] PER CURIAM OPINION (Pages: 5) [13-7002]
Search for this case: Ian James v. International Painters And Al, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: International Painters And Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan
Represented By: Kent Cprek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Gary J. Meyers
Represented By: Kent Cprek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Ian Phillip James
Represented By: Ian Phillip James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.