International Union, Security v. Assane Faye
| International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America |
| Assane Faye |
| 15-7084 |
| August 18, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Labor/Management Rept & Disclsure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1207835146
OPINION [1624915] filed (Pages: 10) for the Court by Judge Tatel, CONCURRING OPINION (Pages: 7) by Judge Tatel,CONCURRING OPINION (Pages: 10) by Judge Millett, DISSENTING OPINION (Pages: 12) by Judge Kavanaugh. [15-7084]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: International Union, Security v. Assane Faye | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America | |
| Represented By: | Anton G. Hajjar |
| Represented By: | Scott A. Brooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: Assane Faye | |
| Represented By: | Eden Brown Gaines |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
