Citizens for Responsibility v. DOJ
| Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington |
| United States Department of Justice |
| 16-5138 |
| May 31, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. DOJ
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1207922461
OPINION [1672056] filed (Pages: 13) for the Court by Judge Wilkins. [16-5138]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Citizens for Responsibility v. DOJ | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington | |
| Represented By: | Adam Jeffrey Rappaport |
| Represented By: | David Lane Sobel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: United States Department of Justice | |
| Represented By: | DOJ Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
