Senate Permanent Subcommittee v. Carl Ferrer
Petitioner - Appellee: Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
Respondent - Appellant: Carl Ferrer
Case Number: 16-5232
Filed: August 11, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 16, 2017 Summary Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations v. Ferrer

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 1207928577 OPINION [1675345] filed (Pages: 14) for the Court by Judge Tatel. [16-5232, 16-5274]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Senate Permanent Subcommittee v. Carl Ferrer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
Represented By: Patricia Mack Bryan
Represented By: Morgan J. Frankel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: Carl Ferrer
Represented By: Stanley M. Brand
Represented By: Robert Lawrence Corn-Revere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?