Sandwich Isles Communications, v. FCC, et al
| Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. |
| United States of America and Federal Communications Commission |
| 19-1056 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REPLY [1782322] filed by FCC to response [ # 1781192-2 ] [Service Date: 04/11/2019 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 602 Words. [19-1056] (Carr, James) [Entered: 04/11/2019 10:48 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1782195] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/10/2019 ] [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:58 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1782194] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/10/2019 ] [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:53 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1782196] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/10/2019 ] [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/10/2019 04:00 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1782201] submitted by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/10/2019 ] [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/10/2019 04:05 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1782203] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/10/2019 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/10/2019 04:08 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1781192] to motion [ # 1779610-2 ] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 04/04/2019 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: This document contains 2342 words and complies with Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5) and Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(6). [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 04/04/2019 09:26 PM] |
| MOTION [1779610] to dismiss case (Response to Motion served by hand due on 04/05/2019). (Response to Motion served by mail due on 04/05/2019) filed by FCC (Service Date: 03/26/2019 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 363 words. [19-1056] (Carr, James) [Entered: 03/26/2019 04:20 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1777446] filed by Frances Marshall and co-counsel Robert B. Nicholson on behalf of Respondent USA. [19-1056] (Marshall, Frances) [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:11 PM] |
| AMENDED PETITION FOR REVIEW [1777470] filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 03/13/2019 ] [19-1056] (Smith, Lex) [Entered: 03/13/2019 04:37 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1776875] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1776872-2 ] [19-1056] [Entered: 03/11/2019 11:04 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1776876] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER statement of issues due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER underlying decision due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER procedural motions due 04/10/2019. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 04/25/2019. Directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 04/10/2019. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 04/10/2019. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 04/25/2019. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 04/25/2019 [19-1056] [Entered: 03/11/2019 11:09 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1777009] filed by James M. Carr and co-counsel Jacob M. Lewis, Richard K. Welch on behalf of Respondent FCC. [19-1056] (Carr, James) [Entered: 03/11/2019 04:30 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1776872] of a decision by federal agency filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. [Service Date: 03/05/2019 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [19-1056] [Entered: 03/11/2019 11:02 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [19-1056] [Entered: 03/11/2019 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
