Arapahoe County Public Airport v. FAA, et al
| Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority |
| Federal Aviation Administration and Daniel K. Elwell, in his capactiy as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration |
| 19-1134 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1793915] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER statement of issues due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER underlying decision due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER procedural motions due 07/22/2019. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 08/05/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 07/22/2019. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 07/22/2019. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 08/05/2019. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 08/05/2019 [19-1134] [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:17 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1793909] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1793907-2 ] [19-1134] [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:05 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1793907] of a decision by federal agency filed by Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority [Service Date: 06/19/2019 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [19-1134] [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:04 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [19-1134] [Entered: 06/21/2019 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
