John Barnett, III v. DOL
Petitioner: John Monroe Barnett, III
Respondent: Craig E. Leen, Director and Department of Labor
Case Number: 19-1171
Filed: August 14, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 CLERK'S ORDER [1803245] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER statement of issues due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER underlying decision due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER procedural motions due 09/23/2019. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 10/07/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 09/23/2019. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 09/23/2019. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 10/07/2019. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 10/07/2019, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:41 PM]
August 22, 2019 FIRST CLASS and CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1803248] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 4056] of order [ # 1803242-6 ], [ # 1803245-6 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 09/23/2019 from John Monroe Barnett III. [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:55 PM]
August 22, 2019 CLERK'S ORDER [1803242] filed directing party to file payment of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 09/23/2019; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis PETITIONER motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 09/23/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:35 PM]
August 22, 2019 CERTIFIED COPY [1803238] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1803235-2 ] [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:11 PM]
August 14, 2019 PETITION FOR REVIEW [1803235] of a decision by federal agency filed by John Monroe Barnett, III [Service Date: 08/14/2019 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:08 PM]
August 14, 2019 PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [19-1171] [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Barnett, III v. DOL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig E. Leen, Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Monroe Barnett, III
Represented By: John Monroe Barnett III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?