California Public Utilities Co v. FCC, et al
California Public Utilities Commission |
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission |
19-1202 |
October 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1810329] filed by Thaila K. Sundaresan on behalf of Respondent FCC in 19-1164, 19-1202. [19-1164, 19-1202] (Sundaresan, Thaila) [Entered: 10/10/2019 01:41 PM] |
AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1809631] to case opening document [ # 1809412-2 ] filed by California Public Utilities Commission in 19-1202. [19-1202, 19-1164] (Lippi, Kimberly) [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:25 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1809416] filed consolidating cases 19-1202 (Consolidation started 10/04/2019) with 19-1164; directing party to file in 19-1202 payment of docketing fee: PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 11/04/2019. Directing party to file in 19-1202 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 11/04/2019, PETITIONER statement of issues due 11/04/2019. [19-1164, 19-1202] [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:49 AM] |
CERTIFIED COPY [1809415] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1809412-2 ] [19-1202] [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:44 AM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW [1809412] of a decision by federal agency filed by California Public Utilities Commission [Service Date: 10/01/2019 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Attached; Certificate of Parties: Not Applicable to this Filing. [19-1202] [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:43 AM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [19-1202] [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.