American Anti-Vivisection Soc, et al v. AGRI, et al
| American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition |
| Sonny Perdue, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Agriculture and United States Department of Agriculture |
| 19-5015 |
| January 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 American Anti-Vivisection Society v. United States Department of Agriculture
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1775640] submitted by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:54 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1775638] filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:53 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1775670] filed by John S. Koppel and co-counsel Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellees AGRI and Sonny Perdue. [19-5015] (Koppel, John) [Entered: 03/01/2019 06:33 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1775671] to notice [ # 1775670-2 ] filed by AGRI and Sonny Perdue. [19-5015] (Koppel, John) [Entered: 03/01/2019 06:36 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1775672] filed by AGRI and Sonny Perdue [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] [19-5015] (Koppel, John) [Entered: 03/01/2019 06:44 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1775636] filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:52 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1775635] filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:51 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1775629] filed by E. Rebecca Gantt and co-counsel Lyle D. Kossis on behalf of Appellants American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition. [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:46 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1775631] filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:48 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1775632] filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition [Service Date: 03/01/2019 ] [19-5015] (Gantt, Emily) [Entered: 03/01/2019 04:49 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1771127] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-01138-TNM filed by American Anti-Vivisection Society and Avian Welfare Coalition. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5015. [19-5015] [Entered: 01/30/2019 04:09 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1771133] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT statement of issues due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT underlying decision due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT transcript status report due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT procedural motions due 03/01/2019. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 03/18/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 03/01/2019. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 03/01/2019. APPELLEE procedural motions due 03/01/2019. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 03/18/2019 [19-5015] [Entered: 01/30/2019 04:24 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5015] [Entered: 01/30/2019 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
