Dennis Ball v. John Does 1-X, et al
| Dennis Andrew Ball |
| John Does 1-X, ABC Partnerships 1-X, Charles E. Grassley, Senate, Jane Does 1-X, United States House & Senate Judiciary Committees & Chairman, ABC Corporations 1-X and Robert Goodlatte, House |
| 19-5032 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT BRIEF and APPENDIX [1781032] filed by Dennis Andrew Ball [Service Date: 04/03/2019 ] Length of Brief: 22 pages. [19-5032] [Entered: 04/03/2019 05:37 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1776458] received from illegible for order [1774310-2] sent to Appellant Dennis Andrew Ball [19-5032] [Entered: 03/07/2019 09:45 AM] |
| FIRST CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1774310] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7016 3010 0000 2295 2705] of order [ # 1774307-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 03/25/2019 from Dennis Andrew Ball. [19-5032] [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:21 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1774307] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 04/12/2019. APPENDIX due 04/12/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5032] [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:18 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1774305] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-02667-UNA filed by Dennis Andrew Ball. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5032. [19-5032] [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:14 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5032] [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
