Orma Buie v. Janet Dhillon, et al
| Michael J. Dougherty, Director, EEOC/State and Local Programs, Reuben Danials, Director, Charlotte District Office, Nicholas M. Inzeo, Director, Office of Field Programs, Kendra Duckworth, Disability Coordinator, Mary Burks, Program Analyst/Acting Supervisor, Victoria Ann Lipnic, Acting Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Janet Dhillon, Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Orma Buie |
| 19-5105 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1791846] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1790320-2 ]; APPELLANT and APPELLEE dispositive motions, if any, due 07/19/2019 [19-5105] [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:45 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1790320] to extend time to file dispositive motions to 05/30/2019 filed by Mary Burks, Reuben Danials, Michael J. Dougherty, Kendra Duckworth, Nicholas M. Inzeo and Victoria Ann Lipnic Length Certification: 571 words. [19-5105]--[Edited 06/03/2019 by LMF] (Johnson, Wyneva) [Entered: 05/30/2019 06:42 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES, DOCKETING STATEMENT, DEFERRED APPENDIX STATEMENT, STATEMENT OF ISSUES, TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT and UNDERLYING DECISION [1789750] filed by Orma Buie [Service Date: 05/20/2019 ] [19-5105] [Entered: 05/28/2019 01:44 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1788515] filed by Mary Burks, Reuben Danials, Michael J. Dougherty, Kendra Duckworth, Nicholas M. Inzeo and Victoria Ann Lipnic [Service Date: 05/20/2019 ] [19-5105] (Johnson, Wyneva) [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:42 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1788514] filed by Wyneva Johnson and co-counsel R. Craig Lawrence on behalf of Appellees Mary Burks, Reuben Danials, Michael J. Dougherty, Kendra Duckworth, Nicholas M. Inzeo and Victoria Ann Lipnic. [19-5105] (Johnson, Wyneva) [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:40 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1785260] received from Orma Buie for order [1783580-2] sent to Appellant Orma Buie [19-5105] [Entered: 04/30/2019 11:50 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1783512] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/20/2019. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/03/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/20/2019. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/20/2019. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/20/2019. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/03/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5105] [Entered: 04/18/2019 09:51 AM] |
| FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT and CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1783580] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3040 0001 1261 3967] of order [ # 1783512-6 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/20/2019 from Orma Buie. [19-5105] [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:28 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1783169] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:13-cv-01181-ABJ filed by Orma Buie. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5105. [19-5105] [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:27 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5105] [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
