Lena Lasher v. HHS, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lena Lasher
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General (OIG), Sheila Ann Hegy, Presiding Board Member, Christopher S. Randolph, United States Department of Health and Human Services, (DHHS), Susan S. Yim and Departmental Appeals Board, (DAB)
Case Number: 19-5114
Filed: April 24, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2019 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1792648] received from Zasher [signed for on 06/08/2019] for order [1791446-2] sent to Appellant Lena Lasher [19-5114] [Entered: 06/13/2019 01:53 PM]
June 6, 2019 FIRST CLASS MAIL AND CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1791446] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7007 0710 0004 7195 8536] of order [ # 1791288-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 07/08/2019 from Lena Lasher. [19-5114] [Entered: 06/06/2019 01:12 PM]
June 5, 2019 CLERK'S ORDER [1791288] filed granting appellees' consent motion to extend time to file dispositive motions [ # 1790475-2 ], Any dispositive motions are now due by 07/10/2019. A request for appointment of counsel does not relieve appellant of the obligation to file responses to any motion filed by appellee or to comply with any order issued by the court. Failure by appellant to respond to a dispositive motion or to comply with any order of the court, including this order, will result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38. [19-5114] [Entered: 06/05/2019 05:43 PM]
May 31, 2019 CONSENT MOTION [1790475] to extend time to file motion to 07/10/2019 filed by Departmental Appeals Board, DOJ, Sheila Ann Hegy, HHS, Christopher S. Randolph and Susan S. Yim (Service Date: 05/31/2019 by US Mail) Length Certification: 285 Words. [19-5114]--[Edited 06/04/2019 by LMF] (Sroka, Scott) [Entered: 05/31/2019 03:14 PM]
May 28, 2019 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1791280] filed by Lena Lasher [Service Date: 05/23/2019 ] [19-5114] [Entered: 06/05/2019 04:52 PM]
May 23, 2019 MOTION [1790012] to appoint counsel filed by Lena Lasher (Service Date: 05/21/2019 by US Mail) Length Certification: 11 pages. [19-5114] [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:38 PM]
May 23, 2019 MOTION [1790007] for transcripts in forma pauperis filed by Lena Lasher (Service Date: 05/21/2019 by US Mail) Length Certification: 7 pages. [19-5114] [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:29 PM]
May 23, 2019 DOCKETING STATEMENT, STATEMENT OF ISSUES, ENTRY OF APPEARANCE, CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES [1790003] filed by Lena Lasher [Service Date: 05/21/2019] [19-5114] [Entered: 05/29/2019 03:25 PM]
May 23, 2019 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1789117] filed by Departmental Appeals Board, DOJ, Sheila Ann Hegy, HHS, Christopher S. Randolph and Susan S. Yim [Service Date: 05/23/2019 ] [19-5114] (Sroka, Scott) [Entered: 05/23/2019 09:25 AM]
May 23, 2019 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1789116] filed by Scott L. Sroka on behalf of Appellees HHS, DOJ, Departmental Appeals Board, Sheila Ann Hegy, Christopher S. Randolph and Susan S. Yim. [19-5114] (Sroka, Scott) [Entered: 05/23/2019 09:24 AM]
April 30, 2019 NOTICE [1785412] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court transmitting supplment of NOA with modified text [19-5114] [Entered: 05/01/2019 10:38 AM]
April 24, 2019 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1784537] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:17-cv-01746-ABJ filed by Lena Lasher. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5114. [19-5114] [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:48 PM]
April 24, 2019 CLERK'S ORDER [1784540] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/24/2019. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/10/2019. Directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/24/2019. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/24/2019. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/24/2019. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/10/2019. Directing party to file appointment of counsel motion: APPELLANT motion for appointment of counsel due 05/24/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5114] [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:52 PM]
April 24, 2019 FIRST CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1784541] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7016 3010 0000 2295 2798] of order [ # 1784540-7 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/24/2019 from Lena Lasher. [19-5114] [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:59 PM]
April 24, 2019 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5114] [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lena Lasher v. HHS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Lena Lasher
Represented By: Lena Lasher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General (OIG)
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Represented By: Scott Leeson Sroka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Sheila Ann Hegy, Presiding Board Member
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Christopher S. Randolph
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Health and Human Services, (DHHS)
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Represented By: Scott Leeson Sroka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Susan S. Yim
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Departmental Appeals Board, (DAB)
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?