Robert McNeil, et al v. G. Harvey, et al
| Christopher R. Cooper, G. Michael Harvey, Amy Berman Jackson and Dale A. Drozd |
| Lee C. Prymmer, William B. McGarvin, Harold R. Stanley, Mark Crumpacker, Ebenezer K. Howe, IV, Barry E. Brooks, Gregory Albert Darst, Lynne M. Kuchenbuch, Gary Dwaileebe, Louis Ronald Depolo and Melba Ford |
| Robert A. McNeil and Michael Beals Ellis |
| 19-5127 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [1791699] marked "Return to sender - unclaimed - unable to forward". Certified Mail [1786613-2] had been sent to Party Michael Beals Ellis. [19-5127] [Entered: 06/07/2019 02:52 PM] |
| MOTION [1791148] to require appellants to serve in this appeal only the lead appellate counsel for the defendant judges filed by Christopher R. Cooper, Dale A. Drozd, G. Michael Harvey and Amy Berman Jackson (Service Date: 06/05/2019 by US Mail) Length Certification: 905 words. [19-5127] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 06/05/2019 12:57 PM] |
| MOTION [1791725] to hold case in abeyance, or to extend time to file initial submissions, styled as "emergency motion to stay briefing schedule," filed by Michael Beals Ellis and Robert A. McNeil (Service Date: 06/04/2019 by US Mail) Length Certification: 5 Pages. [19-5127] [Entered: 06/07/2019 04:00 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1789520] received from Robert McNeil [signed for on 05/15/2019] for order [1786613-2] sent to Appellant Robert A. McNeil [19-5127] [Entered: 05/24/2019 03:26 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1788236] filed by Christopher R. Cooper, Dale A. Drozd, G. Michael Harvey and Amy Berman Jackson [Service Date: 05/17/2019 ] [19-5127] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 05/17/2019 09:47 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1788235] filed by Anthony T. Sheehan on behalf of Appellees Christopher R. Cooper, Dale A. Drozd, G. Michael Harvey and Amy Berman Jackson. [19-5127] (Sheehan, Anthony) [Entered: 05/17/2019 09:45 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1786475] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:17-cv-01720-RC filed by Michael Beals Ellis and Robert A. McNeil. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5127. [19-5127] [Entered: 05/07/2019 12:15 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1786591] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT statement of issues due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT underlying decision due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT transcript status report due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT procedural motions due 06/06/2019. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/21/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 06/06/2019. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 06/06/2019. APPELLEE procedural motions due 06/06/2019. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/21/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5127] [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:37 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL and FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1786613] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7007 0710 0004 7196 8788 for Robert McNeil and 7007 0710 0004 7196 8795 for Michael Ellis] of order [ # 1786591-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/06/2019 from Michael Beals Ellis and Robert A. McNeil. [19-5127] [Entered: 05/07/2019 03:16 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5127] [Entered: 05/07/2019 12:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
