In re: Anthony Keyter
| In re: Anthony P. Keyter |
| 19-5159 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PER CURIAM ORDER [1796108] filed granting motion ifp in this Court [ # 1790030-2 ] [Case Number 19-5159: IFP]; denying petition for writ of mandamus [ # 1790029-2 ]; denying petition for writ of prohibition [ # 1790029-3 ]. No mandate shall issue. Before Judges: Pillard, Rao and Sentelle. [19-5159] [Entered: 07/08/2019 01:03 PM] |
| MOTION [1790030] to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [Case Number 19-5159: IFP Pending USCA] filed by Anthony P. Keyter [Service Date: 05/29/2019 ] Length Certification: 7 pages. [19-5159] [Entered: 05/29/2019 04:40 PM] |
| PETITION [1790029] for writ of mandamus, for writ of prohibition filed by Petitioner Anthony P. Keyter [Service Date: 05/29/2019 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 18 pages. [19-5159] [Entered: 05/29/2019 04:38 PM] |
| US CIVIL ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [19-5159] [Entered: 05/29/2019 04:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Anthony Keyter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Not yet classified: In re: Anthony P. Keyter | |
| Represented By: | Anthony P. Keyter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
