Dennis Ball v. John Does 1-X, et al
| Elizabeth Strange, US Attorney, District Arizona, John Does 1-X, Charles E. Grassley, United States Senate, ABC Partnerships 1-X, Jane Does 1-X, Robert Goodlatte, United States House & Senate Judiciary Committees and Chairman and ABC Corporations 1-X |
| Dennis Andrew Ball |
| 19-5232 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT BRIEF [1812337] filed by Dennis Andrew Ball [Service Date: 10/24/2019 ] Length of Brief: 15 pages. [19-5232] [Entered: 10/24/2019 11:52 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1806605] received from Dennis Ball for order [1804609-2] sent to Appellant Dennis Andrew Ball [19-5232] [Entered: 09/16/2019 09:28 AM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL and FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1804609] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7019 0700 0000 5269 1195] of order [ # 1804607-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 10/03/2019 from Dennis Andrew Ball. [19-5232] [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:26 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1804607] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 10/23/2019. APPENDIX due 10/23/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5232] [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:25 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1804604] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01569-UNA filed by Dennis Andrew Ball. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5232. [19-5232] [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:22 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5232] [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
