Yvonne Hickman v. USA, et al
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, also known as FBI and United States Department of Justice |
Yvonne Hickman |
19-5320 |
November 20, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION [1822758] for summary remand styled as "motion to dismiss appellant's brief due to fraud upon the court" filed by Yvonne Hickman [Service Date: 01/06/2020 ] Length Certification: 3 pages. [19-5320] [Entered: 01/06/2020 02:34 PM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1818724] received from unreadable [signed for on 11/26/2019] for order [1816765-2] sent to Appellant Yvonne Hickman [19-5320] [Entered: 12/04/2019 02:12 PM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1816765] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7019 0700 0000 5269 2123] of order [ # 1816764-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 12/20/2019 from Yvonne Hickman. [19-5320] [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:38 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1816764] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 01/09/2020. APPENDIX due 01/09/2020. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-5320] [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:36 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1816754] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-02283-UNA filed by Yvonne Hickman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5320. [19-5320] [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:18 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5320] [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.