Blue Water Baltimore, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
Blue Water Baltimore, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network, Waterkeepers Chesapeake, Gunpowder Riverkeeper and ShoreRivers |
Chester River Association |
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in his official capacity |
19-5334 |
November 27, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1821957] filed granting motion to substitute party or change name [ # 1820265-2 ] Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy in 19-5334 substituted by ShoreRivers in 19-5334; extending Clerk order initial submissions [ # 1818131-2 ] APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/28/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/28/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/28/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/28/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 02/28/2020. Any procedural motions due 02/28/2020. Any dispositive motions due 03/13/2020 [19-5334] [Entered: 12/30/2019 01:11 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1821233] filed by Amelia G. Yowell on behalf of Appellee Andrew Wheeler. [19-5334] (Yowell, Amelia) [Entered: 12/20/2019 05:53 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION [1820265] to substitute party ShoreRivers for Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy filed by Blue Water Baltimore, Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network and Waterkeepers Chesapeake [Service Date: 12/16/2019 ] Length Certification: 97 words. [19-5334] (Sewell, Anna) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:15 AM] |
STATEMENT [1820264] with Disclosure Listing filed by Blue Water Baltimore, Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network and Waterkeepers Chesapeake [Service Date: 12/16/2019 ] [19-5334] (Sewell, Anna) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:10 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION [1820261] to extend time to file initial submissions to 02/28/2020 filed by Blue Water Baltimore, Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network and Waterkeepers Chesapeake [Service Date: 12/16/2019 ] Length Certification: 614 words. [19-5334] (Sewell, Anna) [Entered: 12/16/2019 11:03 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1819230] filed by Anna M. Sewell on behalf of Appellants Blue Water Baltimore, Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network and Waterkeepers Chesapeake. [19-5334] (Sewell, Anna) [Entered: 12/06/2019 04:57 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1818131] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/02/2020. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/16/2020; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/02/2020. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/02/2020. APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/02/2020. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/16/2020 [19-5334] [Entered: 12/02/2019 10:35 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1818128] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:16-cv-00452-RBW filed by Blue Water Baltimore, Gunpowder Riverkeeper, Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy, Potomac Riverkeeper Network and Waterkeepers Chesapeake. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-5334. [19-5334] [Entered: 12/02/2019 10:33 AM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-5334] [Entered: 12/02/2019 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.