Sylvia Sanchez, et al v. DC, et al
District of Columbia and D.C. Public Schools |
Z.B., a minor, by and through his mother Sylvia Sanchez and Sylvia Sanchez |
19-7048 |
May 28, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1799169] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 09/30/2019. APPELLEE Brief due on 10/30/2019. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 11/20/2019. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 11/27/2019. Final Briefs due 12/11/2019. [19-7048] [Entered: 07/25/2019 05:41 PM] |
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1794910] to record [ # 1794908-2 ], statement [ # 1794904-2 ], statement [ # 1794900-2 ], notice [ # 1794894-2 ], report [ # 1794893-2 ] filed by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B.. [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:53 PM] |
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1794908] submitted by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B. [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:51 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1794927] filed by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B. [Service Date: 06/27/2019 ] [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 04:33 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1794929] filed by Sonya L. Lebsack and co-counsel Loren L. AliKhan and Caroline S. Van Zile on behalf of Appellees D.C. Public Schools and DC. [19-7048] (Lebsack, Sonya) [Entered: 06/27/2019 04:41 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1794930] filed by D.C. Public Schools and DC [Service Date: 06/27/2019 ] [19-7048] (Lebsack, Sonya) [Entered: 06/27/2019 04:44 PM] |
STATEMENT OF ISSUES and STATMENT OF INTENT TO UTILIZE DEFERRED JOINT APPENDIX [1794904] filed by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B. [Service Date: 06/27/2019 ] [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:49 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [1794900] filed by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B. [Service Date: 06/27/2019 ] [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:40 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1794894] filed by Chesseley Robinson on behalf of Appellants Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B.. [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:28 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1794893] filed by Sylvia Sanchez [Service Date: 06/27/2019 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [19-7048] (Robinson, Chesseley) [Entered: 06/27/2019 03:25 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1789814] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:18-cv-00087-CKK filed by Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-7048. [19-7048] [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:25 PM] |
LETTER [1789818] sent regarding attorney membership to Chesseley Alexander Robinson, III for Sylvia Sanchez and Z.B.. Application for Admission due 06/27/2019. [19-7048] [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:35 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1789820] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT statement of issues due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT underlying decision due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT notice of appearance due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT transcript status report due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT procedural motions due 06/27/2019. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 07/12/2019; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 06/27/2019. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 06/27/2019. APPELLEE procedural motions due 06/27/2019. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 07/12/2019 [19-7048] [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:39 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-7048] [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.