L. Ruther v. Kentucky, et al
| L. Ruther |
| Kentucky and Scott Cox |
| 19-7084 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1803205] received from Illegible [signed for on 08/15/2019] for order [1801756-2] sent to Appellant L. Ruther [19-7084] [Entered: 08/22/2019 10:07 AM] |
| RESPONSE [1803382] to order [ # 1801753-2 ] filed by L. Ruther (Service Date: 08/23/2019 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1 page. [19-7084] [Entered: 08/23/2019 11:26 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1801756] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7017 3380 0000 3149 6943] of order [ # 1801753-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 09/11/2019 from L. Ruther. [19-7084] [Entered: 08/12/2019 05:10 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1801753] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 09/11/2019. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-7084] [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:57 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1801748] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01043-UNA filed by L. Ruther. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-7084. [19-7084] [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:44 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-7084] [Entered: 08/12/2019 04:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
