L. Ruther v. Kentucky, et al
| L. Ruther |
| Kentucky, Timothy Mure and Andy Brohear |
| 19-7130 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION [1819126] to schedule oral argument filed by L. Ruther [Service Date: 12/06/2019 ] Length Certification: 1 page. [19-7130] [Entered: 12/06/2019 12:38 PM] |
| MOTION [1814130] to produce document filed by L. Ruther [Service Date: 11/04/2019 ] Length Certification: 3 pages. [19-7130] [Entered: 11/04/2019 02:41 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1812186] received from Judith Coleman [signed for on 10/19/2019] for order [1811162-2] sent to Appellant L. Ruther [19-7130] [Entered: 10/23/2019 02:40 PM] |
| FIRST CLASS AND CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1811162] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70190700000052691508] of order [ # 1811098-4 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 11/15/2019 from L. Ruther. [19-7130] [Entered: 10/16/2019 04:34 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1810959] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01274-UNA filed by L. Ruther. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-7130. [19-7130] [Entered: 10/16/2019 10:02 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1811098] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/05/2019. APPENDIX due 12/05/2019, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-7130] [Entered: 10/16/2019 02:15 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-7130] [Entered: 10/16/2019 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
