Joi Kelly v. Commonwealth of Virginia, et al
Joi M. Kelly |
John Doe, Occupants, Reda Burroughs, Commonwealth of Virginia, Jane Doe, Occupant and Ryan Burroughs |
19-7134 |
October 29, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE [1815451] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 19-7134: IFP] [19-7134] [Entered: 11/13/2019 11:19 AM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1815073] received from Joi Kelly [signed for on 10/31/2019] for order [1813074-2] sent to Appellant Joi M. Kelly [19-7134] [Entered: 11/08/2019 02:33 PM] |
FIRST CLASS MAIL and CERTIFIED MAIL SENT [1813074] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7019 0700 0000 5269 0945] of order [ # 1813069-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 12/02/2019 from Joi M. Kelly. [19-7134] [Entered: 10/29/2019 12:42 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1813069] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 12/18/2019. APPENDIX due 12/18/2019. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [19-7134] [Entered: 10/29/2019 12:35 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1813063] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-02567-UNA filed by Joi M. Kelly. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 19-7134. [19-7134] [Entered: 10/29/2019 12:30 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [19-7134] [Entered: 10/29/2019 12:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.