Vincent Apruzzese v. Cmsnr. IRS
| Vincent J. Apruzzese |
| Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
| 20-1043 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1829422] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. Tax Court filed by Vincent J. Apruzzese [Service Date: 02/20/2020] Case transferred from: USCA 11th Circuit as Case No. 19-15161. [20-1043] [Entered: 02/20/2020 06:59 PM] |
| U.S. TAX COURT CASE docketed. [20-1043] [Entered: 02/20/2020 06:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vincent Apruzzese v. Cmsnr. IRS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Vincent J. Apruzzese | |
| Represented By: | Vincent J. Apruzzese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue | |
| Represented By: | Paul Allulis |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Haungs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
